As the 2026 North America World Cup kicks off Thursday, analysts say the chances of the United States and Iran meeting on the pitch are slim.
A report published Wednesday by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, titled "World Cup 2026: Sport and Conflict," found that among the 48 nations competing this year, only four pairs of hostile nations are present — the United States and Iran, Iran and Saudi Arabia, Iran and Qatar, and Morocco and Algeria. The probability of any such matchup occurring is no more than 0.35 percent.
That figure is lower than the all-time World Cup high of 1.09 percent, recorded at the 1982 Spain World Cup, which was held during the Falklands War between Britain and Argentina.
However, the number of hostile-nation pairs — four — is the highest ever recorded. While the number of participating teams has grown from 13 to 48, the proportion of adversarial matchups has fallen sharply.
CSIS Korea Chair Victor Cha and Deputy Director Andy Lim reached these conclusions after analyzing the draws of all 23 World Cups held between 1930 and 2026.
"All four pairs of hostile nations competing in this year's tournament have been placed in different groups, meaning they cannot meet until the knockout rounds — and even then, the likelihood of an encounter remains low," the report said. "Iran and the United States are currently at war, but the chances of them facing each other at the World Cup are slim. That said, a meeting in the knockout rounds cannot be entirely ruled out."
The research also found that the probability of nations in conflict — including those at war — facing each other at any World Cup has never exceeded 1.1 percent.
Hostile nations have met at the World Cup only four times in the tournament's history.
At the 1974 West Germany World Cup, East Germany and West Germany faced each other — the only match the two nations ever played before reunification. Cha and his co-authors described it as "one of the biggest upsets in World Cup history."
At the 1986 Mexico World Cup, England and Argentina — bitter rivals following the Falklands War — met in a match that became one of the most storied in the tournament's history.
The United States and Iran, whose relations soured after the Iranian Revolution, have also met on the World Cup stage. At the 1998 France World Cup, the two teams posed together for a group photo, and the Iranian squad presented their American counterparts with white roses as a symbol of peace.
The two sides met again at the 2022 Qatar World Cup, where Iranian players refused to sing their national anthem in a show of solidarity with anti-government protests at home, signaling their resistance to the ruling authorities.
This year's tournament is already showing signs of political tension spilling onto the sporting stage, as the United States and Iran remain locked in a high-stakes military standoff marked by airstrikes.
Reports have emerged that the United States canceled the ticket allocation assigned to Iranian supporters, and the US government denied visas to roughly 15 members of the Iranian team's administrative and support staff. In response, Iran relocated its training camp from Tucson, Arizona, to Tijuana, a Mexican border city.
On the question of whether the World Cup could serve as a diplomatic opening, Cha and his co-authors were cautious. "While the World Cup can captivate global audiences, create memorable moments, and foster goodwill, it is unlikely to open a path to peace without additional enabling factors," they wrote.
"Sport can only help create a peaceful breakthrough when quiet diplomacy is already underway and the political will exists among relevant leaders," the researchers said. "Without genuine effort from both sides, it will be difficult for political leaders to find a decisive diplomatic breakthrough through a soccer match."
ygmoon@heraldcorp.com
